Bills & Beans

Straight Talk on Coffee, Money, and Liberty

Author: Richard Coleman

  • The Bill of Rights in Plain Language: What Each Amendment Protects You From

    The Bill of Rights in Plain Language: What Each Amendment Protects You From

    A heavy iron bolt drawn shut across the inside of a plain wooden door, lit by low raking sunlight

    Ten amendments were ratified together on December 15, 1791, and every amendment in the Bill of Rights is written as a restraint rather than as a grant, with a government and not a citizen as the party bound. Direction is the whole point.

    Against Congress, in the first of the ten

    The First Amendment names the body it binds in its own first word. The clause reads “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion”. The subject of that prohibition is a legislature.

    Four of the ten name the party whose hands are tied: Congress in the First, a Soldier in the Third, a Court of the United States in the Seventh, and the United States in the Tenth, which reserves what was never delegated to it. The other six name no actor at all.

    Congress proposed twelve articles on September 25, 1789, and ten of them were ratified two years later. Articles three through twelve are the ten that survived. The amendment opening on the word Congress was proposed as Article the third.

    Advertisement

    Through a prosecution, at each stage the text names

    Four of the ten sit inside the criminal process. The Fourth reaches the search and the warrant. The Fifth reaches the charge, the compelled answer and the taking of property. The Sixth sets the terms of the trial, and the Eighth reaches bail, fines and punishment.

    Every one of those verbs implies a public actor behind it. Warrants issue, a person is held to answer, bail is required, and none of that can be done by anyone outside an office. The text names no officer, and does not need to.

    The Seventh is the civil counterpart, and it names its court outright. No fact tried by a jury, it says, “shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States”.

    Beyond the enumerated rights, in the last two

    The Ninth and the Tenth describe no right. The Ninth is an instruction about reading. The enumeration of certain rights, it says, “shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people”. The party restrained is whoever does the construing.

    The Tenth is an accounting of power. Powers not delegated to the United States, and not prohibited by it to the States, are reserved “to the States respectively, or to the people”. Neither clause is a promise made to a person. Both tell an official body what it may not assume it holds. How much the Tenth adds is contested. In 1941 the Court called it “but a truism that all is retained which has not been surrendered” (United States v. Darby, 312 U.S. 100, 124). Since 1992 the commandeering cases have read it as a limit Congress can run into. Congress, that line holds, “lacks the power directly to compel the States to require or prohibit” acts (New York v. United States, 505 U.S. 144, 166). Printz v. United States extended that to a State’s own officers. Both readings address the same party.

    The same test runs through all ten, and the National Archives transcript of the enrolled original is the printing every quotation below follows. The middle column below asks the same question of each of the ten: who is restrained.

    AmendmentWho or what it restrainsThe operative words, quoted
    FirstCongress, named in the opening word“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble …”
    SecondNo actor is named; the clause is written in the passive“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
    ThirdA Soldier, in peace and in war; in peacetime the Owner’s consent is the condition“No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.”
    FourthWhoever searches or seizes, and whoever issues a warrant; neither is named“no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized”
    FifthWhoever holds a person to answer, tries them twice, compels testimony, or takes property“No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury”; “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation”
    SixthNo actor is named; the clause confers the rights on the accused and leaves the party bound unnamed“In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed …”
    SeventhAny Court of the United States, named outright“no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law”
    EighthWhoever requires bail, imposes a fine or inflicts a punishment; none is named“Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.”
    NinthWhoever construes the Constitution“The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”
    TenthThe United States, which holds delegated powers only“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

    Under the Fourteenth Amendment, in the words No State shall

    On their own the ten run against the federal government and nothing else. The Supreme Court said so in 1833, in Barron’s takings claim against the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore. These amendments, it held, “contain no expression indicating an intention to apply them to the state governments”. The Court added that it “cannot so apply them”. The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, supplied words the first ten never had. Its first section turns to the States in its second sentence: “No State shall make or enforce any law”. Whether a clause of the first ten binds a State is a question put under that later text.

    Advertisement

    Between private parties, the amendments are silent

    That structure answers a question people ask constantly. A private employer is not Congress. A neighbour is not a court. A company is not a State. None of the ten places a duty on any of them, because none of the ten is addressed to them, and the Fourteenth adds only “No State”. That is settled doctrine and not an inference. Of the Fourteenth Amendment the Supreme Court said in 1883 that “Individual invasion of individual rights is not the subject-matter of the amendment”. For the ten, Barron settles it.

    Protection against a private party comes from a different instrument. A statute, a contract, a condition of employment: each has its own text and its own reach. The phrase “protects you from” means from official action, and the narrowness is the doctrine’s own structure.

    One limit sits on all of it. Who a clause is addressed to is settled by its words. What counts as an unreasonable search, or an excessive fine, is not. Those words open that question rather than closing it.

    The short version

    Across all ten, the party under restraint is a public one

    Private people run all through the set, and never as the party restrained. The Third names an Owner, whose consent is what a soldier lacks. The Sixth names the accused, who holds the rights it lists. Where the ten name a party bound, they name a public one, and where they name none, the clause forbids the act and leaves the actor out. Ask of any of the ten who is being told to stop. The answer is a public actor every time.

    This is educational content explaining what each amendment says, not commentary on any pending legislation or litigation.

  • Firearm Terms the Law Uses: A Plain-Language Guide to the Categories

    Firearm Terms the Law Uses: A Plain-Language Guide to the Categories

    A wooden gavel lying across its round sound block on a dark slate surface

    Congress did not use the ordinary meanings of these words. It wrote definitions of its own, in 18 U.S.C. § 921 and 26 U.S.C. § 5845, with one registration provision at 26 U.S.C. § 5841.

    The statutory definition of a firearm reaches the frame or receiver by itself

    Start with the term the rest of federal gun law hangs on. The definition at 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(3) has four parts. The first is “any weapon (including a starter gun) which will or is designed to or may readily be converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive”. The second is “the frame or receiver of any such weapon”. The third and fourth are “any firearm muffler or firearm silencer” and “any destructive device”.

    Subparagraph (B) is the part that surprises people. A frame or receiver is a firearm on its own, with nothing attached.

    Subparagraph (C) reaches a component most people call by another name. The statute’s words are “firearm silencer” and “firearm muffler”. Section 921(a)(25) defines both as a device “for silencing, muffling, or diminishing the report of a portable firearm”. The same paragraph reaches “any combination of parts” intended for assembling one, and “any part intended only for use in such assembly or fabrication”. Everyday speech has settled on a third word.

    Ordinary speech sorts guns into categories the statute never names. That gap is worked through in a separate piece on “assault rifle” and AR-15, and this piece leaves the pair there.

    Advertisement

    Under title 18, any gun made in or before 1898 falls outside the definition

    The definition closes with one short sentence: “Such term does not include an antique firearm”. The definition it points at is § 921(a)(16).

    Subparagraph (A) covers any firearm “manufactured in or before 1898”. It names matchlock, flintlock and percussion cap ignition among others. Subparagraph (B) covers replicas of those, on conditions about the ammunition a replica takes. Subparagraph (C) covers muzzle loading rifles, shotguns and pistols designed to use black powder or a black powder substitute. Those must also be unable to use fixed ammunition.

    Subparagraph (C) then carves things back out of itself. It excludes any weapon incorporating a firearm frame or receiver. It excludes a firearm converted into a muzzle loading weapon.

    One term, two titles, two texts. Title 26 defines “antique firearm” again, and more narrowly, at 26 U.S.C. § 5845(g). There the date of manufacture is not enough on its own. A gun designed for conventional centerfire fixed ammunition still counts, unless that ammunition is no longer made and is not readily available. A citation to one is not a citation to the other.

    The design test does the work for rifle, shotgun and handgun

    Three definitions share a formula. A rifle, under § 921(a)(7), is “designed or redesigned, made or remade, and intended to be fired from the shoulder”. It is made “to fire only a single projectile through a rifled bore for each single pull of the trigger”. A shotgun, under § 921(a)(5), repeats the shoulder language. The definition substitutes “a smooth bore” and “either a number of ball shot or a single projectile”.

    The formula asks what the object was designed, made and intended to be. It does not ask what the object looks like.

    A handgun sits on a different axis. Under § 921(a)(30) a handgun “has a short stock and is designed to be held and fired by the use of a single hand”. Subparagraph (B) adds “any combination of parts” from which such a firearm can be assembled. Check that paragraph number before you cite it. Section 921(a)(29) defines a different term, “semiautomatic rifle”.

    The short-barreled categories are settled with a tape measure

    Most legal tests ask for judgement. These two ask for a ruler. A short-barreled rifle, under § 921(a)(8), has “one or more barrels less than sixteen inches in length”. The same paragraph reaches a weapon made from a rifle whose overall length falls under twenty-six inches. A short-barreled shotgun, under § 921(a)(6), uses eighteen inches for the barrel and the same twenty-six overall.

    Paragraphs (1) through (4) of 26 U.S.C. § 5845(a) set the same thresholds on the tax side. The measurement itself asks for no judgement, though the object has to be a rifle or a shotgun first, and those two definitions are the design-and-intent tests above. A threshold written as a number does not drift, and that is the reason for writing it that way.

    Advertisement

    The National Firearms Act uses the word firearm to mean eight specific things

    Section 5845 opens “For the purpose of this chapter—” and then redefines a familiar word. Under § 5845(a) a firearm is one of eight things. Four are the short-barreled categories above. The other four are “any other weapon” as defined in subsection (e), a machinegun, a destructive device, and “any silencer (as defined in section 921 of title 18, United States Code)”. The subsection then excludes antique firearms, and devices other than machineguns and destructive devices that the Secretary finds are primarily collector’s items.

    The tax statute writes no silencer definition of its own. It borrows the one in title 18. Amend § 921(a)(25) and § 5845(a)(7) moves with it.

    Membership in that list is what attaches consequences. The registry provision, 26 U.S.C. § 5841(a), directs a “central registry of all firearms in the United States”. Firearms the United States possesses or controls are excluded. The word firearms there carries the § 5845(a) meaning, not the ordinary one. Under § 5841(b), manufacturers, importers and makers register what they make or import. A transferred firearm is registered to the transferee by the transferor.

    Set the terms side by side. Some turn on design and intent. One lays a measurement on top of a design test. One turns on nothing but membership in a list.

    TermStatutory citationWhat the definition turns on
    Firearm18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(3)Expelling a projectile by the action of an explosive; also the frame or receiver, a muffler or silencer, and a destructive device
    Antique firearm18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(16)Manufacture in or before 1898; for replicas, the ammunition; for muzzle loaders, black powder and no fixed ammunition
    Shotgun18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(5)Designed, made and intended to be fired from the shoulder; a smooth bore
    Rifle18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(7)Designed, made and intended to be fired from the shoulder; a rifled bore; a single projectile
    Handgun18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(30)A short stock, and design to be held and fired by the use of a single hand
    Short-barreled shotgun18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(6); 26 U.S.C. § 5845(a)(1)-(2)Barrels under 18 inches; or, for a weapon made from a shotgun, overall length under 26 inches
    Short-barreled rifle18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(8); 26 U.S.C. § 5845(a)(3)-(4)Barrels under 16 inches; or, for a weapon made from a rifle, overall length under 26 inches
    Firearm silencer, firearm muffler18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(25)Being a device for silencing, muffling or diminishing the report of a portable firearm
    Firearm, in the NFA sense26 U.S.C. § 5845(a)Membership in an eight-item list, with antiques and collector’s items excluded

    The short version

    A federal definition decides federal questions and stops there

    Each term above is defined for a stated purpose, and § 5845 says so outright: “for the purpose of this chapter”. States define several of the same words in their own codes, so a federal meaning is not a meaning everywhere. Paragraph numbers move as Congress amends: “firearm silencer” sits at § 921(a)(25) today. Repealed paragraphs leave gaps behind, which is why § 921(a)(31) is printed as repealed by Pub. L. 103-322. Open the section and read it before relying on a citation to it.

    This is educational content explaining statutory terminology, not commentary on any pending legislation or litigation.

  • Assault Rifle vs. AR-15: Two Terms, Two Different Meanings

    Assault Rifle vs. AR-15: Two Terms, Two Different Meanings

    An AR-15 is a specific semi-automatic rifle Colt has sold since the 1960s — and, in everyday speech, the generic name for thousands of similar rifles built by other companies.

    Key takeaways

    • “AR” stands for ArmaLite Rifle, the company that designed it in the 1950s. It has never stood for “assault rifle.”
    • Colt holds the trademark, so almost every rifle people call an AR-15 is an AR-15-pattern rifle made by someone else.
    • Manufacturers of AR-15-pattern rifles grew from 29 in 2000 to roughly 500 by 2015.
    • Civilian versions are semi-automatic only, and machine guns made after May 19, 1986 cannot be newly registered for civilian ownership.
    • “Assault rifle” describes how a gun fires. “Assault weapon” is a statutory list of features. They are two different terms.
    A brass desk seal press standing alone on a bare wooden table in raking light, its jaws closed and its die hidden, casting a long shadow

    “AR-15” gets used two different ways in everyday conversation, and they’re not the same thing — and neither one is quite the same as “assault rifle” either. One is a specific product line with a specific history. The other is shorthand people reach for to describe almost any modern-looking semi-automatic rifle. Knowing the difference makes you harder to mislead, in either direction.

    AR doesn’t stand for “assault rifle”

    It stands for ArmaLite Rifle, named for the company that designed it in the 1950s. ArmaLite sold the design to Colt in 1959. Colt built a fully automatic version for military contracts, the M16. It also built a semi-automatic civilian version, marketed as the “AR-15.” Same lineage, two different products from the start.

    The “assault rifle” mix-up is understandable but wrong. It’s an acronym coincidence, not a description. Gun debates get heated fast. “AR” sounding like it could stand for something scarier than “ArmaLite” has kept the myth alive for decades.

    Advertisement

    Colt still owns the name — almost nobody else’s rifle is technically an “AR-15”

    Here’s the part that surprises people: Colt holds the trademark. Strictly speaking, Colt is the only company that can legally call its product an “AR-15.”

    Every other manufacturer selling a similar rifle uses its own model name instead. Bushmaster, Ruger, Smith & Wesson, and dozens more each sell a functionally comparable, semi-automatic, magazine-fed rifle built on the same general design. That list exploded once Colt’s original patents expired in the 1970s. By one count, the number of manufacturers making AR-15-pattern rifles grew from 29 in 2000 to roughly 500 by 2015.

    “AR-15” became the generic name for the whole category, the way “Kleenex” or “Xerox” did in their own product categories. Almost every rifle called an AR-15 today is really an AR-15-pattern rifle made by someone else.

    Civilian versions don’t fire automatically — and haven’t been legally new-manufactured since 1986

    This is the distinction that actually matters for understanding what these rifles do. The military M16 and M4 are select-fire: the shooter can choose semi-automatic, burst, or fully automatic. Civilian AR-15-pattern rifles are semi-automatic only — one trigger pull, one round, every time. That’s not a manufacturer choice; it’s federal law.

    Since the 1986 Hughes Amendment, machine guns made after May 19, 1986 can’t be newly registered for civilian ownership at all. A finite supply of pre-1986 registered machine guns still legally changes hands, at prices that reflect just how limited that supply is. But no civilian is walking out of a gun store today with a new, fully automatic rifle of any kind — AR-15-pattern or otherwise.

    Advertisement — advertiser disclosure

    “Assault rifle” and “assault weapon” are two different terms, not one

    This is where a lot of the confusion actually starts. They sound interchangeable. They’re not.

    Assault rifle is a military and technical term. It means a select-fire weapon, capable of semi-automatic, burst, or fully automatic fire. It’s typically chambered for an intermediate cartridge with a detachable magazine. By that definition, a semi-auto-only civilian AR-15-pattern rifle isn’t an assault rifle.

    Assault weapon is a legal and political term instead. It’s defined feature-by-feature in specific statutes, not by how the gun fires. The 1994 Federal Assault Weapons Ban classified certain semi-automatic rifles as “assault weapons” based on cosmetic and accessory features: things like a pistol grip separate from the stock, a folding or telescoping stock, a flash suppressor, or a bayonet lug. Automatic-fire capability had nothing to do with it. State assault weapon laws today generally follow that same feature-based approach, though the specific list varies by state.

    So a rifle can be legally classified as an “assault weapon” in one state, and be, mechanically, the exact same semi-automatic-only rifle sold everywhere else in the country. The classification is about listed features, not about how the trigger behaves.

    The short version

    Why the distinction is worth knowing

    None of this is an argument for or against any particular policy. It’s just accuracy. “Assault rifle,” “assault weapon,” and “AR-15” get used as if they’re one interchangeable idea. They describe three different things instead: a firing mechanism, a legal category built on cosmetic features, and a specific (mostly generic-use) product name. Getting the terms right doesn’t resolve the policy debate. But it means you’re actually debating the same thing the other person is.

    This is educational content explaining terminology and mechanics, not commentary on any pending legislation or litigation.

    Article sources

    1. Snopes — Does “AR” in AR-15 Stand for “Assault Rifle”? (acronym origin, ArmaLite/Colt history)
    2. Wikipedia — AR-15–style rifle (Colt trademark, generic-name usage, manufacturer count 2000–2015, civilian vs. military firing modes)
    3. Public Law 99-308, the Firearm Owners’ Protection Act (govinfo) — enacted May 19, 1986; § 102(9) is the Hughes Amendment, adding 18 U.S.C. 922(o), and § 110(c) makes it effective on enactment
    4. U.S. Code (Office of the Law Revision Counsel) — 18 U.S.C. § 922(o), Transfer or possession of machinegun (statute text; the effective-date note gives May 19, 1986)
    5. USCCA — Assault Rifle Definition: Cut Through the Confusion (assault rifle vs. assault weapon definitions, 1994 Federal AWB feature list)